December 2016 #UMichChat recap

Are we consumers of fact or fiction? How do sensationalized headlines and inaccurate stories shape our perception of current events? In an online environment full of fake news, how do professional journalists continue producing quality content and ensure they are reporting real news?

Our December 2016 #UMichChat addressed these questions and more, as we brought together a panel of journalists and media scholars to discuss “Facts and Fabrication: The Offline Implications of Sensationalized Online Journalism.”

Clickbait and fake news have been on the radar of social media companies and media publishers for a few years. But the recent presidential election has brought more focus to the topic. A 2015 Pew Research Study found that 62 percent  of sampled adults get their news from social media, a significant increase from the percentage of respondents who reported this behavior in 2013. As more and more Americans turn to social media as a primary news source, it becomes more important than ever to address this critical issue.

 

Our four panelists were:

  • Chad Livengood, political journalist for the Detroit News
  • Jeff Barrett, CEO of status creative and regular contributor to publications such as Hootsuite, Mashable, and the Huffington Post
  • Paige Pfleger, U-M alumna and reporter/producer for WHYY, the Philadelphia- based NPR station.
  • Ceren Budack: Assistant professor at the U-M School of Information, who researches media bias and the spread of misinformation online

Our panelists answered complicated questions that related to this issue, such as:

 

How social media is impacting news dissemination:

Q3Ceren a31 Ceren a32 Ceren a33 Chad A3 Chad A32 Chad A33 Jeff A3 Paige A3

 

Their definition of journalistic integrity:

Q5Chad A5 Jeff A5 Paige A5

How clickbait has impacted the news landscape:

Q7            Ceren a7 Chad a7 ChadandPaigea7 Jeffa7

The motivation to create fake news:Q9

Ceren A9 Chad A9 Jeff A9 Paige A9

—and many more. The combined expertise of our panelists, along with our audience’s interest in this topic, resulted in a dynamic, meaningful, and engaged conversation, with panelists sharing ideas not only with the audience but also with each other:

Interactions

 

One of the most exciting moments of the chat was when News writer Livengood had to stop answering questions so he could tweet breaking news. (A candidate had just announced a run for Michigan GOP Chair.) The audience got to witness journalism in action, and see the truth of the old adage that ‘news never stops’ with this first-hand of example of breaking news dissemination on social media..

-Chad’s tweet.

Over the course of the hour, our hashtag was used 226 times by 56 distinct contributors. Tweets containing #UMichChat reached an estimated audience of 729,469 people, generating more than 11 million impressions worldwide. Not even halfway into the chat, #UMichChat was one of the top 10 trending topics in the Detroit area, and was even identified as the #50 trending topic in the United States:

-Follow the hashtag

Trending Ttrends

#UMichChat has consistently been a trending topic each month since May 2015, and we predict that this pattern will continue with conversations to come.

If you weren’t able to join us for the live conversation, you can find an archive of the whole chat on Storify. We’re extremely pleased with the outcome of this chat and look forward to facilitating many more great conversations in 2017. Be sure to follow along!

This post was written by Sarah Barnitt, #UMSocial intern and Bachelor of Science in Information senior. #StaySocial with her on Instagram and Twitter @SarahBarnitt